Show simple item record

dc.contributor.adviserCabarles, Jaime Jr
dc.contributor.authorMondragon, Kennard John S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-06T02:52:12Z
dc.date.available2021-07-06T02:52:12Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationMondragon, K. J. S. (2019). Evaluation of the in vitro anthelmintic activity of Premna odorata B., Lantana camara L. and Psidium guajava L. extract against Ascaridia galli in Philippine native chicken (Unpublished Special paper). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/1165
dc.descriptionAbstract onlyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe study was conducted at CPU-CARES Research and Development Area, Jaro, Iloilo City from May 11 to 16, 2019. This was done to evaluate the in vitro anthelminthic activity of Premna odorata, Lantana camara, and Psidium guajava leaf extract. Physiological saline and synthetic dewormer were used as negative control and positive control, respectively. The study involved the determination of the percent worm mobility inhibition (%WMI) and percent mortality (%M). The experiment used 15 petri dishes with five roundworms each. The experimental treatments were laid out in a completely randomized design (CRD) with three replications. Results revealed that in terms of %WMI, piperazine was the most effective at 86.67% WMI after 6 hrs. Piperazine and lantana leaf extract (LLE) were found to be statistically the same after 12 hrs and 18 hrs PE at 100% and 66.67% WMI, respectively. On the other hand, alagao leaf extract (ALE) and guava leaf extract (GLE) had the least %WMI after 12 hrs and18 hrs post exposure (PE). After 24 hrs PE, all the plant materials (LLE, ALE, GLE), showed the same effect having 66.67%, 60.00%, and 60.00% efficacy while physiological saline solution had 0% WMI. In percent mortality, piperazine was the most effective having 80% mortality, the same with alagao (ALE) and lantana leaf extract (LLE) with 26.67% and 40% mortality, respectively. However, worms exposed to guava leaf extract (GLE) and physiological saline remained alive until 24 hrs (PE). These indicate that ALE and LLE had anthelmintic activity and can be used as potential source of dewormer against A. galli.en_US
dc.format.extentix, 27 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.ddcFilipiniana Theses 630.72 M744en_US
dc.subject.lcshLantana camaraen_US
dc.subject.lcshGuavaen_US
dc.subject.lcshPlant extractsen_US
dc.subject.lcshParasitesen_US
dc.subject.lcshChickensen_US
dc.subject.lcshChickens--Parasitesen_US
dc.subject.lcshChickens--Parasites--Controlen_US
dc.subject.lcshParasites--Controlen_US
dc.subject.lcshNematodesen
dc.subject.lcshNematodesen
dc.subject.lcshNematodes--Controlen
dc.titleEvaluation of the in vitro anthelmintic activity of Premna odorata B., Lantana camara L. and Psidium guajava L. extract against Ascaridia galli in Philippine native chickenen_US
dc.typeSpecial paperen_US
dc.description.bibliographicalreferencesIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberPatricio, Hope G.
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Agriculture, Resources and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Science in Agricultureen_US
local.subjectNative chickenen_US
local.subjectRoundwormsen
local.subject.scientificnamePremna odorataen_US
local.subject.scientificnameLantana camaraen_US
local.subject.scientificnamePsidium guajavaen_US
local.subject.scientificnameAscaridia gallien_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines