Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.adviserHisuan Jr., Armando
dc.contributor.authorGomez, Jerson M.
dc.contributor.authorCortes, Chrynz Jand'l F.
dc.contributor.authorDingcong, Jamel Leah C.
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-17T02:42:17Z
dc.date.available2025-10-17T02:42:17Z
dc.date.issued2025-03
dc.identifier.citationGomez, J. M., Cortes, C. J. F., & Dingcong, J. L. C. (2025). Exploring the economic and environmental status of spring tourism: A comparative analysis of destination and sustainability practices [Unpublished bachelor's special paper]. Central Philippine University.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/3568
dc.descriptionFull text availableen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to determine the economic and environmental status of spring tourism in San Enrique, Iloilo, and Anini-y, Antique. A comparative analysis, which explores how each destination balances tourism development with sustainability practices, utilized the descriptive-comparative research design. The respondents in the study were 200 individuals from the population of Anini-y, Antique, and San Enrique, Iloilo. Anini-y's programs were well-received but needed improvement, while San Enrique's sustainability practices showed mixed effectiveness. Both resorts could have greatly benefited from focusing more on renewable energy and raising awareness about sustainability to better address both environmental and social needs. In Anini-y, Antique, spring tourism played a major role in creating jobs and providing steady income for local residents. Meanwhile, in San Enrique, Iloilo, the spring resort helped spark new business opportunities, boosting the local economy and supporting the community. However, Anini-y’s economic efforts had a stronger impact on its community compared to San Enrique. From our perspective as researchers, Anini-y stood out for its sustainable and effective approach to tourism, clearly shown through its success in generating jobs, increasing revenue, and ensuring fair income distribution. While both Anini-y and San Enrique had environmental policies in place to support sustainable tourism, Anini-y’s higher performance reflected its strong leadership in environmental management. San Enrique, on the other hand, still had opportunities to strengthen its environmental strategies.en_US
dc.format.extentviii, 176 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCentral Philippine Universityen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://publicdomain.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/*
dc.subject.lccG 155 .A1 .G66 2025en_US
dc.subject.lcshTourismen_US
dc.subject.lcshTourism--Environmental aspectsen_US
dc.subject.lcshSustainable developmenten_US
dc.subject.lcshSustainable tourismen_US
dc.subject.lcshEnvironmental economicsen_US
dc.subject.lcshEconomic developmenten_US
dc.subject.lcshPhilippines--Iloiloen_US
dc.subject.lcshPhilippines--Antiqueen_US
dc.titleExploring the economic and environmental status of spring tourism: A comparative analysis of destination and sustainability practicesen_US
dc.typeSpecial paperen_US
dcterms.accessRightsPublicly accessibleen_US
dc.description.bibliographicalreferencesIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.contributor.chairAlmajar Jr, Ismael
dc.contributor.committeememberLuceno, Myrna
dc.contributor.committeememberBayot, Maria Patricia S.
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Hospitality Managementen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Science in Tourism Managementen_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée