Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.adviserJava, Alberto A.
dc.contributor.authorEparwa, Hazel Joie A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-01T07:03:46Z
dc.date.available2021-06-01T07:03:46Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEparwa, H. J. A. (2015). Assessment and evaluation of Silliman University electrical distribution system (Unpublished Master's special paper). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/949
dc.descriptionAbstract onlyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper focuses on the assessment and evaluation of the existing electrical distribution system of Silliman University. A combination of descriptive and evaluative methods was used in this study. The buildings were assessed to which feeder they were connected. A series of tests on all the buildings during peak loads was conducted to obtain data on voltage, current, and energy consumption during peak hours. The technical transformer losses of the feeders were determined through the Radial Flow Analysis. It was found that the buildings in Feeder 1 consumed 994.15 kWh, those in Feeder 2 consumed 540.43 kWh, and in Feeder 3, 303.80 kWh, having a total of 1838.38 kWh, representing the power consumption of 54.08% for Feeder 1, 29.40% for Feeder 2, and 16.52% for Feeder 3. Generator 1, with a rating of 500 kVA, supplies loads to buildings with a total power consumption of 665.10kWh, while Generator 2, with a rating of 312 kVA supplies loads to buildings with a total power consumption of 492.23 kWh, causing the overloading of the system during peak loads. From the outcomes of the load flow analysis, it was found that the system suffers total technical losses of 109.21 kWh during peak loads every month. This wasted power would be approximately P292,400 per month (or P3,508,800 per year), which is 7.31% of the total monthly compensation. It is recommended that the loads of each building should be balanced to minimize energy losses of the system and thus save a considerable amount from the monthly bill. Acquisition of an additional unit of generator set should also be considered so as to supply sufficient power during NORECO II power outages.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 201 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.ddcGSL Theses 621.3072 Ep16en_US
dc.subject.lcshSilliman Universityen_US
dc.subject.lcshElectric power distributionen_US
dc.subject.lcshElectric power systemsen_US
dc.subject.lcshElectric power systems--Evaluationen_US
dc.titleAssessment and evaluation of Silliman University electrical distribution systemen_US
dc.typeSpecial paperen_US
dc.description.bibliographicalreferencesIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.contributor.chairMolina, Dany C.
dc.contributor.committeememberCalibjo, Cirilo C.
dc.contributor.committeememberAcanto, Caesar Rico S.
dc.contributor.committeememberDavid, Fely P.
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Engineeringen_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines