Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.authorRomallosa, Aries Roda D.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-07T05:38:33Z
dc.date.available2021-04-07T05:38:33Z
dc.date.issued2008-10
dc.identifier.citationRomallosa, A. R. D. (2008). Evaluation of the different rice hull gasifier stoves developed at CPU Approtech Center. Patubas, 4(1), 15-31.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1908-515X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/728
dc.descriptionAbstract onlyen_US
dc.description.abstractFour gasifier stoves, all developed at the Appropriate Technology Center (APPROTECH Center) of CPU, were evaluated in this study in terms of fuel consumption rate, percentage char produced, fire zone rate, thermal efficiency, and electric energy consumption rate. These include: Gasifier A or the cylindrical-type single-burner, top-lit updraft (T-LUD); Gasifier B or the cylindrical-type double-burner, T-LUD (for household use); Gasifier C or the conical-type double-burner T-LUD (for household use), and Gasifier D or the conical-type double-burner T-LUD (for industrial use). Evaluation was conducted at the APPROTECH Center on April 23 to May 29, 2007. Results of the study revealed that Gasifier A significantly (p<0.01) had the highest percentage production of char and thermal efficiency while Gasifier D significantly (p<0.01) produced the highest fuel consumption rate. In general, however, all the three double-burner stoves (Gasifiers B, C, and D) significantly (p<0.01) had higher fire zone rate and consumption of electric energy compared to Gasifier A since these three stoves have two burners and use an electric blower as air moving device, thus consuming more fuel and electric energy. The gas emitted by the gasifier stoves were estimated to contain from 20 to 24% carbon monoxide, 13 to 23% hydrogen gas, 8 to 15% carbon dioxide, 38 to 42% nitrogen, 0 to 2% methane and 7 to 9% water or moisture. Among the gasifiers evaluated, only Gasifier A has the economic advantage over the LPG stove making it ideal when used at the household level. Due to their high investment cost and low economic return, the double- burner stoves (Gasifiers B, C, and D) can still be used for bigger and longer cooking operations.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCentral Philippine Universityen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.lcshRice hullsen_US
dc.subject.lcshRice hulls as fuelen_US
dc.subject.lcshStovesen_US
dc.subject.lcshStoves, Gas--Evaluationen_US
dc.subject.lcshStoves, Gasen_US
dc.subject.lcshStoves, Gas--Testingen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of the different rice hull gasifier stoves developed at CPU APPROTECH Centeren_US
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of the different rice hull gasifier stoves developed at Central Philippine University Appropriate Technology Centeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.citation.firstpage15en_US
dc.citation.lastpage31en_US
dc.citation.journaltitlePatubasen_US
dc.citation.volume4en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
local.subjectCentral Philippine University (CPU). Appropriate Technology Center (APPROTECH).en_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines