Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSeredrica, Ma. Victoria C.
dc.contributor.authorPatricio, Hope G.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-22T02:46:43Z
dc.date.available2021-03-22T02:46:43Z
dc.date.issued2011-12
dc.identifier.citationSeredrica, M. V. C. & Patricio, H. G. (2011). The effect of different green and animal manures on the growth and yield of potted lettuce, cabbage and cauliflower. Patubas, 6(1), 81-96.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1908-515X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/629
dc.descriptionJournal articleen_US
dc.description.abstractThe objectives of the study were to determine the growth and yield and profitability of growing potted cabbage, cauliflower, and lettuce as influenced by different green plant and animal manures. The seven experimental treatments included leaf manure of kamachile (Pithecellobium dulce), ipil-ipil (Leucaena leucocephala), madre de cacao (Gliricidia sepium); poultry manure, commercial compost, inorganic fertilizer, and the control (without fertilizer). These treatments were laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. Results revealed that all agronomic characteristics of the three crops were significantly (p <0.05) affected by the different manures applied. The data show that the growth and yield of lettuce, cabbage, and cauliflower fertilized with kamachile manure, ipil-ipil manure, madre de cacao, poultry manure, and inorganic fertilizer were significantly better than those of plants which were either unfertilized or fertilized with commercial compost. Cost and return analysis indicated that among the different manures in lettuce, ipil-ipil manure resulted in the highest ROI (Return on investment) of 103.71%. That of the unfertilized plants was - 70.10%. In cabbage, only the addition of poultry manure gave a positive ROI (38.28 %). All the other treatments gave a negative ROI (-14.45% to -100%). The negative ROI indicates that the nutrients supplied by the manures are not enough to support the needs of cabbage and cauliflower for them to give economic yield.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCentral Philippine Universityen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.lcshGreen manuringen_US
dc.subject.lcshGreen manure cropsen_US
dc.subject.lcshFertilizersen_US
dc.subject.lcshCabbageen_US
dc.subject.lcshCaulifloweren_US
dc.subject.lcshLettuceen_US
dc.subject.lcshLettuce--Fertilizersen_US
dc.subject.lcshCauliflower--Fertlizersen_US
dc.subject.lcshCabbage--Fertilizersen_US
dc.subject.lcshLead treeen_US
dc.subject.lcshManuresen_US
dc.subject.lcshCrop yieldsen_US
dc.subject.lcshGrowth (Plants)en_US
dc.subject.lcshOrganic fertilizersen_US
dc.subject.lcshUrban gardeningen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different green and animal manures on the growth and yield of potted lettuce, cabbage and caulifloweren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.citation.firstpage81en_US
dc.citation.lastpage96en_US
dc.citation.journaltitlePatubasen_US
dc.citation.volume6en_US
dc.citation.issue1en_US
local.subjectGreen manureen_US
local.subjectKamachileen_US
local.subjectIpil-ipilen_US
local.subjectMadre de cacaoen_US
local.subject.scientificnameBrassica oleraceaen_US
local.subject.scientificnameLactuca sativaen_US
local.subject.scientificnameBrassica oleracea botrytisen_US
local.subject.scientificnamePithecellobium dulceen_US
local.subject.scientificnameLeucaena leucocephalaen_US
local.subject.scientificnameGliricidia sepiumen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines