Показать сокращенную информацию

dc.contributor.adviserDeloso, Homer
dc.contributor.authorPorque, Edilberto P.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T07:36:05Z
dc.date.available2021-07-14T07:36:05Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPorque, E. P. (2020). Acceptability of smoked chicken ham smoked with charcoal enhanced with different plant leaves as additives (Unpublished Special paper). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/1188
dc.descriptionAbstract onlyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted at Brgy. Poblacion, New Lucena, Iloilo on December 5, 2020. Ham evaluation was done at CPU Centennial Village, Pavia, Iloilo. This study was conducted to determine the acceptability of smoked chicken ham enhanced with different plant leaves as additives for smoking materials. There were 3 experimental treatments composed of 3 different leaves namely lemongrass, tamarind, and guava leaves. Each treatment was replicated three times. The smoked chicken ham was evaluated by a taste panel according to a set of criteria. Members of the taste panel were given 10 to 15 minutes to evaluate and rate the samples, food action rating and descriptive analysis. Results revealed that as to the taste preference, smoked chicken ham enhanced with lemongrass, tamarind and guava leaves were rated as more preferred. Furthermore, ANOVA showed no significant differences on the color, saltiness and taste preference of smoked chicken ham. On the other hand, producing smoked chicken ham with tamarind and guava leaves cost less than using lemongrass leaves as additives for smoking material. The commercial ham currently sold in the market costs Php 450.00 per 1 kg which cost Php 198.24, Php 238.24 and Php 245.74 more costly than chicken ham smoked with lemongrass, tamarind, and guava leaves, respectively. Based on the results, it can be concluded that lemongrass, tamarind, and guava leaves can be used as additives for smoking materials in chicken ham given its palatability and acceptability in terms of color and taste preference.en_US
dc.format.extentvii, 34 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.ddcFilipiniana Theses 630.72 P827en_US
dc.subject.lcshCooking (Chicken)en_US
dc.subject.lcshSmoked foodsen_US
dc.subject.lcshSmoking (Cooking)en_US
dc.subject.lcshCooking (Ham)en_US
dc.subject.lcshFood--Sensory evaluationen_US
dc.subject.lcshFood additivesen_US
dc.subject.lcshSpicesen_US
dc.subject.lcshCooking (Spices)en_US
dc.subject.lcshLemongrassen_US
dc.subject.lcshLysilomaen_US
dc.subject.lcshGuavaen_US
dc.subject.lcshLeavesen_US
dc.titleAcceptability of smoked chicken ham smoked with charcoal enhanced with different plant leaves as additivesen_US
dc.typeSpecial paperen_US
dc.description.bibliographicalreferencesIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.contributor.chairCabarles, Jaime Jr
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Agriculture, Resources and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Science in Agricultural Engineeringen_US
local.subjectTamarinden_US
local.subject.scientificnameCymbopogon citratusen_US
local.subject.scientificnameTamarindus indicaen_US
local.subject.scientificnamePsidium guajavaen_US


Файлы в этом документе

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

Показать сокращенную информацию

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines