Показать сокращенную информацию

dc.contributor.adviserRomallosa, Aries Roda D.
dc.contributor.authorCalitisin, Emheryn Grace S.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-14T07:28:11Z
dc.date.available2021-07-14T07:28:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationCalitisin, E. G. S. (2020). Design, fabrication, and performance evaluation of an electric cabinet fruit and vegetable dehydrator (Unpublished Thesis). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/1187
dc.descriptionAbstract onlyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe design of cabinet fruit and vegetable dehydrator aimed to reduce the moisture content of the commodity to lengthen its shelf life while the quality of the product is maintained. It is composed of the following main parts: a) Dehydrating chamber where samples were subjected to dehydration, b) machine frame that served as the framework, c) heat source chamber with incandescent bulbs and auxiliary fans, d) exhaust where excess heat flows out, e) glass door for easy viewing, f) removable trays for easy access and g) temperature controller. It was completed within 4 months including the modifications, pre-testing and final evaluation. It has an overall dimension of 40 cm L x 40 cm W x 40 cm H. The commodities included were banana and mango for fruits, while chili pepper and carrots for vegetables. The machine produced an average dehydrating capacity of 81.33 g/hr, 113.67 g/hr, 44 g/hr and 53.33 g/hr for banana, mango, chili pepper and carrots, respectively. It also obtained a moisture reduction rate of 47 g/hr, 85.67 g/hr, 37.2 g/hr and 48.83 g/hr, respectively. The dehydrating efficiency of the machine ranges from 4.85% to 11.27%, which is too low according to PAES that is 75%. It is due to high amount of heat loss produced during the conduct of the study. Based on the data, the machine produced a moisture loss which ranges from 48.22 % to 75.58 %. The average score obtained from four commodities during the organoleptic test was 4.14, which indicated that the dehydrated products were acceptable. Its operating cost as computed were PHP0.67/g, PHP0.48/g, PHP1.24/g and PHP1.03/g for banana, mango, chili pepper and carrots, respectively.en_US
dc.format.extentix, 50 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.ddcFilipiniana Theses 630.72 C129en_US
dc.subject.lcshDried fruiten_US
dc.subject.lcshDried vegetablesen_US
dc.subject.lcshFood--Dryingen_US
dc.subject.lcshDrying apparatusen_US
dc.subject.lcshFood--Drying--Equipment and suppliesen_US
dc.subject.lcshDrying apparatus--Design and constructionen_US
dc.subject.lcshDrying apparatus--Evaluationen_US
dc.titleDesign, fabrication, and performance evaluation of an electric cabinet fruit and vegetable dehydratoren_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.bibliographicalreferencesIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.contributor.chairCabarles, Jaime C. Jr.
dc.contributor.committeememberPatricio, Hope G.
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Agriculture, Resources and Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeBachelor of Science in Agricultural Engineeringen_US


Файлы в этом документе

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

Показать сокращенную информацию

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines