Afficher la notice abrégée

dc.contributor.adviserAlibogha, Salex E.
dc.contributor.authorMarcelino, Frank G.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-29T06:12:27Z
dc.date.available2021-06-29T06:12:27Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationMarcelino, F. G. (2018). A content analysis of Supreme Court decisions on constitutional implications of franchises, grants or privileges (Unpublished postgraduate thesis). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/1118
dc.descriptionAbstract onlyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study was conducted to determine the constitutional implications of franchises, grants or privileges. Hence, Supreme Court decisions which interpret the subject were analyzed. The Non-Probability sampling technique was used as the researcher aimed for a more convenient identification of Supreme Court decisions. There are 37 cases that were identified that discuss the subject. Primarily using the information provided in Supreme Court decisions and other related sources, the data gathered were analysed in order to achieve the given purposes of the study and make recommendations on how to address present issues confronting the subject matter. It was found out that there are significant constitutional implications regarding the nature of the subject matter of this study and there are scopes and limitations applicable to various powers of the State as against the rights of the grantee. Primarily as a tool of the Police Power of the State, franchising is used for regulation of various services being offered to the public that the Government cannot be able to do itself. Being a contract between the grantor and the grantee, conflicts of rights between the parties may ensue especially on the part of the grantee who may have imbued property rights on the subject as against the grantor who will just treat the subject matter as a mere regulation that can be taken anytime whenever public welfare requires. This study suggests the enactment of an updated legislation regarding the subject matter suited to a more modern complexities and necessities of today.en_US
dc.format.extentvi, 53 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.ddcLaw Library 340.72 M331 2018en_US
dc.subject.lcshPhilippines. Supreme Courten_US
dc.subject.lcshCourt decisions and opinionsen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudgmentsen_US
dc.subject.lcshCharters, grants, privilegesen_US
dc.subject.lcshCorporationsen_US
dc.subject.lcshPublic utilitiesen_US
dc.subject.lcshMunicipal franchisesen_US
dc.subject.lcshConstitution (Philippines : 1987)en_US
dc.titleA content analysis of Supreme Court decisions on constitutional implications of franchises, grants or privilegesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.bibliographicalreferencesIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.contributor.chairBedona, Zacarias D. Jr.
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Lawen_US
dc.description.degreeJuris Doctoren_US


Fichier(s) constituant ce document

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Ce document figure dans la(les) collection(s) suivante(s)

Afficher la notice abrégée

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Excepté là où spécifié autrement, la license de ce document est décrite en tant que Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines