Ipakita ang simpleng tala ng item

dc.contributor.adviserAlibogha, Salex E.
dc.contributor.authorSillador, Pearl Diamond E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-29T03:06:48Z
dc.date.available2021-06-29T03:06:48Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSillador, P. D. E. (2019). A content analysis of disbarment cases involving canons of legal ethics on the morality of lawyers (Unpublished postgraduate thesis). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/1114
dc.descriptionAbstract onlyen_US
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzed selected disbarment cases on the ground of immorality which are violative, specifically, of Rules 1.01 Canon 1 and 7.03 of Canon 7 of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Disbarment is the act of the court in withdrawing from an attorney the privilege to practice law. Accordingly, to justify suspension or disbarment, the act complained of must not only be immoral, but grossly immoral. A grossly immoral act is one that is so corrupt and false as to constitute a criminal act or an act so unprincipled or disgraceful as to be reprehensible to a high degree. However, after the content analysis of ten (10) disbarment cases, it has been found out that despite of the prohibitions laid down by said Rules which were designed for lawyers to deter from committing immoral acts, there are lawyers who are still facing disbarment cases on the ground of immorality. As a matter of fact, some were already suspended and disbarred. Thus this study was contemplated to examine Rule 1.01 of Canon 1 and Rule 7.03 of Canon 7 of the Code of Professional Responsibility on the Morality of Lawyers; to evaluate the rationale of both Rules; to analyse Supreme Court decisions concerning violations thereon; and, to determine disciplinary measures imposed by the Supreme Court. Qualitative Data Analysis was the method used in this study where certain disbarment cases on the ground of immorality were analysed. Moreover, ten (10) disbarment cases on the ground of immorality from the year 2012 to 2016 were gathered and extracted from the website lawphil.net. Also, online sources, books, journals, news, other laws and jurisprudence related to this study were used to support researcher’s analysis.en_US
dc.format.extentix, 66 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.ddcLaw Library 340.72 Si35 2019en_US
dc.subject.lcshLawyersen_US
dc.subject.lcshLawyers--Disbarment, disqualification, etc.en_US
dc.subject.lcshPhilippines. Supreme Courten_US
dc.subject.lcshCourt decisions and opinionsen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudgmentsen_US
dc.subject.lcshImmoralityen_US
dc.subject.lcshProfessional ethicsen_US
dc.subject.lcshLegal ethicsen_US
dc.subject.lcshEthicsen_US
dc.titleA content analysis of disbarment cases involving canons of legal ethics on the morality of lawyersen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.bibliographicalreferencesIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.contributor.chairBedona, Zacarias D. Jr.
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Lawen_US
dc.description.degreeJuris Doctoren_US


Mga file sa item na ito

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Lumilitaw ang item na ito sa mga sumusunod na (mga) Koleksyon

Ipakita ang simpleng tala ng item

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Maliban kung sa kabilang banda ay nabanggit, ang lisensya ng item na ito ay inilarawan bilangAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines