Ipakita ang simpleng tala ng item
An analysis of selected Supreme Court decisions on infringement and counterfeiting of products and goods in relation to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293) and its legal implications to the legal system
dc.contributor.adviser | Alibogha, Salex E. | |
dc.contributor.author | Nogra, Kristian Eldie A. | |
dc.coverage.spatial | Philippines | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-06-28T01:45:00Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-06-28T01:45:00Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Nogra, K. E. A. (2019). An analysis of selected Supreme Court decisions on infringement and counterfeiting of products and goods in relation to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293) and its legal implications to the legal system (Unpublished postgraduate thesis). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/1102 | |
dc.description | Abstract only | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Ideas are a gruelling feature of a human mind to protect because they are so easily imitated or copied. We don't yet live in the world of Star Trek where you can just have a replicator instantly make you an exact duplicate of physical things like a cup of coffee or some exotic alien delicacy, but we can easily duplicate the ideas of others, such as copying a piece of written material, using a similar brand name, or creating a product in imitation of someone else’s product. Products take time to develop and bring to market. Once a product has been developed, it can be imitated in a fraction of the time. It would be easy for other companies to create competitive products or services within a very short period of time. For example, consider the recent “employee discount” advertising campaigns from the major auto manufacturers. General Motors came up with the idea, but Ford and Chrysler had imitated it within a couple of weeks after the GM campaign started. Advertising campaign ideas generally aren't protectable intellectual property. On the other hand, consider the innovative Segway transportation device. Once the very first one becomes publicly available, it would have been very easy for someone else to disassemble one, see how it was made, and start building less expensive imitations. That hasn't happened and won't happen anytime soon, because the Segway is protected by a patent, and the makers of Segway would have a solid legal basis for going after such a competitor for a lot of money. Intellectual property refers to those ideas that can be considered “owned” by an individual or company and are therefore protectable under the law. The intent of intellectual property law is to encourage innovation by giving the creators of new ideas ample time to profit from their ideas and recuperate their development costs. In theory, your intellectual property is protected under the law from the moment you create it, assuming someone else hasn't created it first (and even then in some circumstances). However, making the case in court may be very difficult if all you have to go on is your own records. Intellectual property registration exists so that you can make an official record of your ideas and more easily protect them should a conflict ever arise. | en_US |
dc.format.extent | ix, 89 leaves | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/ | * |
dc.subject.ddc | Law Library 340.72 N68 2019 | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Philippines. Supreme Court | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Copyright infringement | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Intellectual property | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Court decisions and opinions | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Judgments | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Counterfeits and counterfeiting | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Product counterfeiting | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Product counterfeiting--Law and legislation | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Counterfeits and counterfeiting--Law and legislation | en_US |
dc.subject.lcsh | Philippines | en_US |
dc.title | An analysis of selected Supreme Court decisions on infringement and counterfeiting of products and goods in relation to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines (Republic Act No. 8293) and its legal implications to the legal system | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.bibliographicalreferences | Includes bibliographical references | en_US |
dc.contributor.chair | Bedona, Zacarias D. Jr. | |
dc.contributor.department | College of Law | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Juris Doctor | en_US |
local.subject | RA 8293 | en_US |
local.subject | Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines | en_US |
Mga file sa item na ito
Lumilitaw ang item na ito sa mga sumusunod na (mga) Koleksyon
-
Juris Doctor [144]