Показать сокращенную информацию

dc.contributor.adviserAlibogha, Salex E.
dc.contributor.authorVelarde-Nandin, Ma. Anele D.
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-25T06:45:58Z
dc.date.available2021-06-25T06:45:58Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationVelarde-Nandin, M. A. D. (2018). A content analysis of Supreme Court rulings on cases in violation of the Speedy Trial Act from 2013-2018 (Unpublished postgraduate thesis). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/1095
dc.descriptionAbstract onlyen_US
dc.description.abstractThe right of the accused to a speedy trial and to a speedy disposition of the case against him was designed to prevent the oppression of the citizen by holding criminal prosecution suspended over him for an indefinite time, and to prevent delays in the administration of justice by mandating the courts to proceed with reasonable dispatch in the trial of criminal cases. This content analysis was conducted to analyze the common rights of the accused which were violated under the speedy trial, the common reasons of such violations and what are the Supreme Court rulings upon those certain types of violations and in order to protect the constitutional right of the accused. The researcher gathered and based her study in the cases decided by the Supreme Court from the year 2013 up to 2018. As the researcher studied and reviewed cases decided by the Supreme Court, the researcher noted the cases which are covered by the speedy trial act, and the reason of the dismissal, acquittal or conviction thereof. And among those results gathered, the researcher was able to identify the most or common violation committed under the speedy trial act. This paper surveyed the different mechanisms in place to ensure that justice is efficiently rendered in this country and in case of failure to do so, the different safeguard mechanisms to address the effects of the violation of a party’s right to have speedy justice. The researcher further concluded that considering that there are so many factors which affects the delivery of a speedy trial, whether it is man-made or not, the key solution is that each of the party necessary for the speedy disposition of the case must participate diligently and effectively in order to avoid such miscarriage of justice.en_US
dc.format.extentviii, 72 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ph/*
dc.subject.ddcLaw Library 340.72 V54 2018en_US
dc.subject.lcshSpeedy trialen_US
dc.subject.lcshPhilippines. Supreme Courten_US
dc.subject.lcshSpeedy trial--Law and legislationen_US
dc.subject.lcshJudgmentsen_US
dc.subject.lcshCourt decisions and opinionsen_US
dc.titleA content analysis of Supreme Court rulings on cases in violation of the Speedy Trial Act from 2013-2018en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.bibliographicalreferencesIncludes bibliographical referencesen_US
dc.contributor.chairBedona, Zacarias D. Jr.
dc.contributor.departmentCollege of Lawen_US
dc.description.degreeJuris Doctoren_US
local.subjectRA 8493en_US
local.subjectSpeedy Trial Act of 1998en_US


Файлы в этом документе

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Данный элемент включен в следующие коллекции

Показать сокращенную информацию

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Philippines