• English
    • Filipino
    • 中文
    • 한국어
    • français
    • русский
  • English 
    • English
    • Filipino
    • 中文
    • 한국어
    • français
    • русский
  • Login
View Item 
  •   BAHÁNDÌAN Home
  • College of Law
  • Theses
  • Juris Doctor
  • View Item
  •   BAHÁNDÌAN Home
  • College of Law
  • Theses
  • Juris Doctor
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A review of Supreme Court decisions on drug cases from 2012-2016: In view of proposing amendments to R.A. No. 9165 otherwise known as the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002”

Thumbnail
View/Open
Thesis abstract (46.39Kb)
Downloads: 296
Page views
2,580
Date
2019
Author
Dela Torre, Lovely L.
Thesis Adviser
Alibogha, Salex E.
Defense Panel Chair
Bedona, Zacarias D. Jr.
Share 
 
Metadata
Show full item record

Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the conviction, acquittal, and dismissal rates of cases in violation of Republic Act No. 9165 otherwise known as the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002 decided by the Supreme Court from 2012 to 2016. Two hundred thirty-four (234) drug cases were decided for that period where one hundred fifty-two (152) led to the conviction of the accused and in the remaining eighty-two (82), the accused was acquitted or the case was otherwise dismissed. Of the eighty-two (82) cases, forty-five (45) cases were selected as sample size using the proportional stratified random sampling method. With qualitative data analysis, specifically, content analysis, as the research design, the cases were analyzed and categorized according to their ratio decidendi. Results showed that the acquittal of the accused or the dismissal of the case were due to broken chain of custody, illegal arrest and/or unlawful search and seizure, non-presentation of witness or of the corpus delicti, death of the accused, compromised evidence, and violation of the right to privacy or of the right against self-incrimination. These grounds pointed to the lack of or inefficient implementation of the provisions of the law by virtue of the procedural lapses, majority of which is the breach in the chain of custody, committed by the apprehending officers.
Description
Abstract only
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12852/1143
Suggested Citation
Dela Torre, L. L. (2019). A review of Supreme Court decisions on drug cases from 2012-2016: In view of proposing amendments to R.A. No. 9165 otherwise known as the “Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002” (Unpublished postgraduate thesis). Central Philippine University, Jaro, Iloilo City.
Type
Thesis
Subject(s)
Philippines. Supreme Court OCLC - FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology); Court decisions and opinions OCLC - FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology); Judgments OCLC - FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology); Drug control OCLC - FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology); Drugs--Law and legislation OCLC - FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology)
Keywords
RA 9165; Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs Act of 2002
Department
College of Law
Degree
Juris Doctor
Shelf Location
Law Library 340.72 D370 2019
Physical Description
vii, 101 leaves
Collections
  • Juris Doctor [144]

Contact Us | Send Feedback | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Logo by HLL
Central Philippine University © 2025
Managed by 
Henry Luce III LibraryHenry Luce III Library
 

 

Links
BAHÁNDÌAN Repository GuideDisclaimerFAQsSubmit your workNews and Updates

Browse

All of BAHÁNDÌANCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
CPU Henry Luce III Library

Contact Us | Send Feedback | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Logo by HLL
Central Philippine University © 2025
Managed by 
Henry Luce III LibraryHenry Luce III Library
 

 

EXTERNAL LINKS DISCLAIMER

This link is being provided as a convenience and for informational purposes only. Central Philippine University bears no responsibility for the accuracy, legality or content of the external site or for that of subsequent links. Contact the external site for answers to questions regarding its content.

If you come across any external links that don't work, we would be grateful if you could report them to the repository administrators.

Click DOWNLOAD to open/view the file. Chat Bertha to inform us in case the link we provided don't work.

Download